October 31, 2014

Occupy Hong Kong movement faces violent opposition

Kennison Garratt
Staff Writer

Pro-democracy protests, known as Occupy Hong Kong, have been facing some violent opposition in response to this act of civil disobedience. The protesters are mostly young people and students protesting the changes in legislative council and chief executive elections that will be enforced in 2016 and 2017. They have been residing in tents in the streets of the financial central district since Sept. 28. The protesters were angered when police came early in the morning and attempted to remove blockades that they had set up. Before, masked men had come out of the subway station with knives and attacked them. They were infuriated because the police would not come to their aid from the anti-Occupy group, possibly one of Hong Kong’s triad gangs, which attempted to break up the demonstrations. After beginning to reconstruct the barriers, protesters began demanding for Chief Executive Leung Chun-Ying to resign as well as free elections for selecting his replacement. But, on other demands, organizers are not sure where all of the protesters stand.


On Sunday, there was a planned vote to represent the support of democracy and free elections. However, organizers cancelled the vote due to confusion regarding wording. The vote was intended to be a display of unity, but it was difficult to tie all of the views together. Although the protesters want full democracy, which was what sparked the protest, the execution and what the protesters want varies between each person.

Since Hong Kong switched from British to Chinese rule in 1997, they have been following “one country, two systems,” meaning autonomy and universal suffrage is supposedly given to both. Yet, Communist Party leaders in China insist on screening candidates. The party said that they support Hong Kong’s administration and do not want external forces intervening.

Musicians and actors have been supporting protesters, and because of this they are not being hired in the mainland. Denise Ho, a pop singer who gains 80% of her income from China, has not been allowed to perform since she has shown public support for Hong Kong. Anthony Wong, a singer, has also joined in these Hong Kong demonstrations. Due to his participation, his performances in China have been “indefinitely postponed” with no explanation. Other artists have also been speaking out about this situation and using social media to spread awareness. Hong Kong film director Wong Jing posted a message directed to the celebrities supporting this demonstration, “We have worked well together in the past and I respect your right to hold your own political views. But I absolutely do not agree. To avoid embarrassment, your contact details will be erased from my phone and my computer. Have a happy life.”

In China, these artists have been blacklisted, and this list of pro-Occupy artists has been spreading across social media. To further enforce this boycott, Xinhau, the state news agency, released a statement warning the artists.


At the start of her support for this movement, Ho performed the song “Raise the Umbrella,” written in reference to the umbrellas that protesters use to defend themselves from pepper spray. Umbrellas have become a symbol of this pro-democracy movement and on Oct. 28, exactly one month after the start of Occupy Hong Kong, all of the protesters raised their umbrellas. It is unknown how long this protest will last, even though the government is powerless to go against Beijing rule and change the “Basic Law.” But it seems that the protesters are attempting to organize themselves a bit more, and will continue to protest peacefully their ideas even against those who don’t follow the same non-violent practices. On the topic of supporting the protests, Wong, who joined protests after the police used tear gas on the protesters, says, “It affects us a lot because much of my income comes from China, about more than half. But I think this is what we have to do. Our markets there and money aren’t more important than our need to speak our mind.”