November 05, 2014

Should college athletes be paid?

Adam Mancini
Sports Editor

In America, there exists a $6 billion a year industry. Its core labor force is almost entirely unpaid. Not only do these laborers accumulate a grand total of $0 an hour, they are actually punished for making any sort of money off of their job. The laborers are college athletes, and the multibillion dollar industry is the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). It’s time for this outdated hierarchy to be changed. College athletes need to be paid.

Star Georgia running back Todd Gurley has brought the issue of whether or not college athletes should be paid back into the spotlight. Gurley has admitted to knowingly signing various pieces of memorabilia and having them sold online, which earned him about $400. Athletes making any sort of money off of their own likeness is a direct violation of NCAA rules, and has resulted in Gurley receiving an indefinite suspension from all team activities. This is a massive example of NCAA hypocrisy. Schools make millions upon millions of dollars by selling athlete-related merchandise, but the athletes themselves are punished severely for benefiting from this in any way. Furthermore, the NCAA applies these rules in a bizarre, inconsistent way. Based on the incidents involving Johnny Manziel and Jameis Winston, Gurley would have gotten off with perhaps a slap on the wrist if he had denied involvement. But because he told the truth, he has been suspended for what could potentially be the rest of the season. Manziel was accused of receiving $7,500 for signing numerous items, and there was even a video of him signing shirts. But Manziel simply denied making any money, so the NCAA only suspended him for one half of a game. Winston was caught in a very similar situation, but once again denied taking any money and as such was only suspended for one half of one game.

All three of these players should never have been investigated for these “scandals” in the first place. College athletes deserve to be compensated. The counterargument to this notion states that students are paid by way of a “free education.” But how useful is this “free education,” when it always comes second to athletics? Less than two percent of these athletes will become professionals and make millions of dollars, and only 65% of student-athletes will even graduate from college in the first place. Many athletes, including former star UConn basketball player Shabazz Napier, complain that the constant commitment to athletics prevents them from getting a job, and many are left without any money for essentials such as food and clothes.


It’s time for student athletes to be considered employees of their schools. As per the terms of their scholarships, playing sports is their job, and people must be paid for doing their jobs. Every day, student-athletes put their health and well-being on the line when they participate in their respective sports. If a player sustains a severe injury and the medical expenses exceed $90,000, the NCAA’s catastrophic injury program kicks in and helps to cover the bills. Superstar athletes have the option of taking out a multimillion dollar insurance plan with the NCAA that ensures they will not miss out on all of their potential earnings if a career-ending injury occurs. However, if one of the other 98% of players sustains a severe injury, they walk away with nothing but a lifetime of medical bills and pain. Universities only have to certify that athletes have a primary insurance provider, they are not held liable to pay for any medical bills. In some cases, the university can even pull the student’s scholarship if they are injured. But at least they got their “free education.”